From the dairy advocates, there are claims that milk and dairy intake are vital for bone health; that dairy intake is essential for strong muscles and healthy skin; that dairy defends against obesity, diabetes, heart disease, and cancer. There are claims that the calcium and vitamin D in milk do things that calcium and vitamin D supplements cannot. There are claims that the saturated fat in dairy is not harmful and may even be beneficial. There are claims, in short, that dairy is just about the best damn food there is.
But the dairy detractors, which, interestingly, include two very disparate groups, the herbivorous vegans, and the rather carnivorous Paleo dieters spout off an array of outlandish claims: that dairy increases cancer risk; that dairy increases cardiovascular risk; that dairy is irrelevant to bone health, or actually detrimental; that dairy consumption is abusive to cows, and the planet; that dairy intake by adult mammals is simply unnatural.
Competing claims about dairy take us deep into the curds and whey. There are arguments that dairy is good, but only if raw; pasteurization, so goes the contention, ruins everything by destroying the active “enzymes.” There are claims that skimming the fat ruins dairy by removing healthful fatty acids, such as conjugated linoleic acids, and other claims that only low-fat and non-fat dairy are good, while full-fat is bad. There are claims that all dairy is good; that milk is good but cheese is bad; that cheese is good, but milk is not; that milk and cheese are good, but butter is not.
Globally, there is clear evidence that dairy intake is NOT essential for the health of adult Homo sapiens. Populations that drink mostly water, eat mostly plants, exercise routinely, and get sunlight (a fast-vanishing combination) tend to have strong bones and hearts and low rates of cancer, stroke, diabetes, with no thanks owed to dairy for any of it. In populations with more physical activity and more sun exposure, but less dairy intake than in the U.S., osteoporosis is less common, not more. In the U.S., where outdoor physical activity levels are low and protein intake is high, dairy is decisively associated with better bone density.
There is no clear evidence that making room for dairy has any capacity to improve the quality of diet, or health, for those cultures that drink mostly water and eat mostly plants. But in the U.S., we drink lots of soda and consume a bounty of highly processed foods. The inclusion of dairy in diets here almost certainly means less of those items, and the epidemiologic evidence shows clearly a net benefit of that shift. In the U.S., typical diets including dairy routinely are associated with better health outcomes than typical diets that exclude it.
Whew…I’m exhausted! I have done my best to keep pace with the literature on such topics, and evaluate it without bias. So… here goes…
Whether or not consuming dairy is good for us depends on:
- If our body can digest it healthfully (just don’t go there if you are lactose intolerant)
- The type of dairy in question
- How much of it we’re eating
- With what other foods—as well as what we’re omitting to accommodate it
Looking across an expanse of evidence without prejudice, I see a case for incorporating non, low and full fat minimally processed, organic, “pasteurize or grass fed” dairy as a beneficial element in the American diet. Making this food category a regular part of the diet offers likely health benefits when compared to a typical American diet that favors sugar-sweetened beverages and processed foods. In the context of our culture, milk can displace soda, and yogurt can displace less nutritious snacks. |
Comments - 1